Skip to content

A composite likelihood approach for inference under photometric redshift uncertainty

Authors

Rau, M. M.;
Morrison, C. B.;
RefereedArticle

Abstract

Obtaining accurately calibrated redshift distributions of photometric samples is one of the great challenges in photometric surveys like LSST, Euclid, HSC, KiDS, and DES. We present an inference methodology that combines the redshift information from the galaxy photometry with constraints from two-point functions, utilizing cross-correlations with spatially overlapping spectroscopic samples, and illustrate the approach on CosmoDC2 simulations. Our likelihood framework is designed to integrate directly into a typical large-scale structure and weak lensing analysis based on two-point functions. We discuss efficient and accurate inference techniques that allow us to scale the method to the large samples of galaxies to be expected in LSST. We consider statistical challenges like the parametrization of redshift systematics, discuss and evaluate techniques to regularize the sample redshift distributions, and investigate techniques that can help to detect and calibrate sources of systematic error using posterior predictive checks. We evaluate and forecast photometric redshift performance using data from the CosmoDC2 simulations, within which we mimic a DESI-like spectroscopic calibration sample for cross-correlations. Using a combination of spatial cross-correlations and photometry, we show that we can provide calibration of the mean of the sample redshift distribution to an accuracy of at least 0.002(1 + z), consistent with the LSST-Y1 science requirements for weak lensing and large-scale structure probes.

Details

© The SAO Astrophysics Data System

help[at]scixplorer.org

SciX is a project created by the Astrophysics Data System (ADS), which is operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory under NASA Cooperative Agreement 80NSSC21M0056.

Version: v0.26.0

*The material contained in this document is based upon work supported by a National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) grant or cooperative agreement. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of NASA.

RESOURCES

About SciXGive FeedbackSciX HelpSystem StatusCareers@SciXAccessibility Conformance ReportWeb Accessibility PolicyNASA Science Discovery Engine