Skip to content

Evidence of galaxy assembly bias in SDSS DR7 galaxy samples from count statistics

Authors

Wang, Kuan;
Guo, Hong;
RefereedArticle

Abstract

We present observational constraints on the galaxy-halo connection, focusing particularly on galaxy assembly bias from a novel combination of counts-in-cylinders statistics, P(NCIC), with the standard measurements of the projected two-point correlation function wp(rp), and number density ngal of galaxies. We measure ngal, wp(rp), and P(NCIC) for volume-limited, luminosity-threshold samples of galaxies selected from SDSS DR7, and use them to constrain halo occupation distribution (HOD) models, including a model in which galaxy occupation depends upon a secondary halo property, namely halo concentration. We detect significant positive central assembly bias for the Mr < -20.0 and Mr < -19.5 samples. Central galaxies preferentially reside within haloes of high concentration at fixed mass. Positive central assembly bias is also favoured in the Mr < -20.5 and Mr < -19.0 samples. We find no evidence of central assembly bias in the Mr < -21.0 sample. We observe only a marginal preference for negative satellite assembly bias in the Mr < -20.0 and Mr < -19.0 samples, and non-zero satellite assembly bias is not indicated in other samples. Our findings underscore the necessity of accounting for galaxy assembly bias when interpreting galaxy survey data, and demonstrate the potential of count statistics in extracting information from the spatial distribution of galaxies, which could be applied to both galaxy-halo connection studies and cosmological analyses.

Details

© The SAO Astrophysics Data System

help[at]scixplorer.org

SciX is a project created by the Astrophysics Data System (ADS), which is operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory under NASA Cooperative Agreement 80NSSC21M0056.

Version: v0.26.0

*The material contained in this document is based upon work supported by a National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) grant or cooperative agreement. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of NASA.

RESOURCES

About SciXGive FeedbackSciX HelpSystem StatusCareers@SciXAccessibility Conformance ReportWeb Accessibility PolicyNASA Science Discovery Engine